|Message: Does the postpone stack induce cross section bias?||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
Does the postpone stack induce cross section bias? In my case I'm using the postpone stack with hadronic physics (ParticleHP).
For example, if I stop a particle in the stepping action at some time (t0), and then send the track to postpone stack. When the track starts during the next event, will the track have a complete knowledge of its history? For example, does it know how many steps it made in the previous event, and therefore correctly calculate the probably of a hadronic event for the next step? Or does the postpone stack create a NEW track at every event, and therefore the tracks lose their history and induce some form of a cross section bias.
Thanks in advance for any help, Cheers, Evan
|Inline Depth:||Outline Depth:||Add message:|