|Message: Re: PreStepPoint vs. PostStepPoint||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
> This is a different issue. Assume you have a calorimeter made of cells, if > the step is limited by the physics, using PreStepPoint or PostStepPoint to > get the geometrical information about the current cell will not make > difference. On the other hand, if the step is limited by the _geometry_ > the PostStepPoint geometrical information will be updated with geometrical > information of the cell in which the track is _entering_. You must thus > always use the PreStepPoint to be garanteed that you assign the energy > deposition to the volume in which the step started and occured.
I came across this problem, when I analyzed a process with a rather long step length, which produces secondary electrons AND deposits ionization energy at the position of the interaction. If I use the PREStepPoint then there is a gap between the ionization energy of the process and the first deposit of the electron. But when I use the POSTStepPoint then I do not have the gap, but - when I understand you correct - then I risk to put the energy deposit into the wrong volume.
So what is the solution?
My idea now is to check the StepStatus in my detector
If the StepStatus of the PostStepPoint is fPostStepDoItProc, I use the PostStepPoint.
If the StepStatus of the PostStepPoint is fPreStepDoItProc, I use the PreStepPoint.
If the StepStatus of the PostStepPoint is fAlongStepDoItProc, I use half the distance between the PreStepPoint and PostStepPoint.
In all other cases, boundaries, etc., I use the PreStepPoint
Does this sound reasonable. Or did I overlook something?
|Inline Depth:||Outline Depth:||Add message:|