|Message: Re: Spin tracking of moving muons||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
Thanks for your detailed and constructive forum posting.
3) As for your last question, the missing third term is an oversight. I noticed it a little while ago when I went back to Jackson. I made mental note to investigate and fix it. Actually, I have no feeling as to when this term (size of E field and beta) becomes sizable relative to the others. Until now, I only thought of E fields inside drift chambers. According to Jackson: "If the particle is relativistic (beta->1), even the presence of an electric field causes the longitudinal polarization to change only very slowly, at a rate proportional to gamma**(-2) times the electric field component perpendicular to v_vector." (I assume you are dealing with 'surface muons' - longitudinal polarized muons?)
2) G4EqEMFieldWithSpin copies from G4EqMagElectricField while G4Mag_SpinEqRhs is a copy of G4Mag_UsualEqRhs. Only if the field can change energy, then the time must be integrated, else:
the time is incremented from the particle's velocity and step length.
1) > Practically, given the way Geant4 handles the energy loss, should I be
> worried about this?
> Do we ever end up in a condition where 1/\beta gets big enough to be a
> problem? If so, is there any good way to deal with this?
You have a very good point. I don't know the answers.... I suggest you flag large final step spin variations - should they occur - in your application. My experience has only ever dealt with muons stopping in a rather homogeneous, albeit strong magnetic field. We never observed a weired spin. We were very sensitive to any false prediction (depolarization) at the 10-3 level and consequently plotted the final spin predicition for each event history for many millions of such histories.
A group who extensively uses spin tracking in G4 is from PSI:
A general paper: T. Shiroka et al., "Geant4 as a simulation framework in muSR" proceedings of the muSR 2008 conference, Tsukuba, Japan (21-25th July 2008), to be published in Physica B.
|Inline Depth:||Outline Depth:||Add message:|