|Message: Will there be double counting of hadronic physics list?||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
I saw that in physics list of example Hadr01, the electromagnetic physics constructors are deleted before new one is added, but as for hadronic physics constructor, the new physics constructor will just push_back to the hadronic physics constructor vector.
So, if, for example, I add the physics list "FTFP_BERT_EMV" and then immediately after that i add "FTFP_BERT_EMX" (from user interface of course), would there be double counting on all hadronic interactions, because I add twice the hadronic physics list "QGSP_BERT"?
Thanks for your opinion.
|Inline Depth:||Outline Depth:||Add message:|