|Message: help needed with variance reduction method - reposting||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
Dear G4 Colleagues,
I've posted this message on the Electromagnetic Processes Forum, but I would also like to post the same question in this Forum.
I am simulating dose deposited to a water phantom at 1 meter away from a 6MeV medical X-ray source. The beam is transmitted through ~4.5 tenth-value-layer slab (~156 mm of tungsten). The incident radiation intensity decreases by a factor of ~25e-06 after passing through the tungsten slab. Because of this drastic intensity attenuation, I have to simulate a very large (~in the billions) number of incoming 6 MeV electrons on the source target. When I calculate with Geant4 (v9.4.p02 ) the dose is ~10 times larger than the experimental measurement.
I suspect that this disagreement is due to limited statistics on the scoring voxels. My intention is to use variance reduction techniques to increase the number of electrons on the X-ray target without increasing the simulation time too much. Could you please advise which variance reduction methods are the most suitable in my case? Is there a working example that I can look at? How about validation studies and/or publications?
Are there any other strategies to help me lower the simulation time (i.e. range cuts, other Physics List, etc)? I have been using Opt3 with 10 um range cut for the particles. Thank you in advance for your advice.