Message: Re: biasing muon cross section interaction Not Logged In (login)
 Next-in-Thread Next-in-Thread
 Next-in-Forum Next-in-Forum

Idea Re: biasing muon cross section interaction 

Forum: Biasing and Scoring
Re: Question biasing muon cross section interaction (Sean Turnbull)
Re: Question Re: biasing muon cross section interaction (Stefan E. Mueller)
Re: Idea Re: biasing muon cross section interaction (C Mos)
Re: Question Re: biasing muon cross section interaction (Stefan E. Mueller)
Re: News Re: biasing muon cross section interaction (Stefan E. Mueller)
Date: 05 Jun, 2014
From: Stefan E. Mueller <Stefan E. Mueller>

OK,

it has been confirmed to me that the weights are unchanged using the way I described. However, I was pointed to the new generic biasing introduced in v10.0, e.g. examples/extended/biasing/GB01.

I am currently trying to implement this in my code.

Stefan

On Mon, 05 May 2014 17:59:57 GMT, Stefan E. Mueller wrote:

> OK,
> 
> I think I managed to set the PIL-factor. I do it at the end of the
> Extra-Physics class I created to register the processes "GammaToMuPair"
> to gamma-process list, and "muonNuclear" to the mu+/mu- process lists,
> e.g.
> 
>    G4double fac = 20000.;
>    G4ProcessTable* theProcessTable = G4ProcessTable::GetProcessTable();
>    G4MuonNuclearProcess* muPlusNucScaleProcess = (G4MuonNuclearProcess*)
>             theProcessTable->FindProcess("muonNuclear","mu+");
>    if(muPlusNucScaleProcess) muPlusNucScaleProcess->SetPILfactor(1./fac);
> 
> However, I noted that e.g. for the process "GammaToMuPair", I can also
> call "SetCrossSecFactor(factor)".
> 
> What is the difference between "SetPILfactor(factor)" and
> "SetCrossSecFactor(factor)"? Which of the two will set the weight of the
> produced tracks accordingly? Both? None?
> 
> Stefan
> 

 Add Message Add Message
to: "Re: biasing muon cross section interaction"

 Subscribe Subscribe

This site runs SLAC HyperNews version 1.11-slac-98, derived from the original HyperNews