Message: Re: biasing muon cross section interaction Not Logged In (login)
 Next-in-Thread Next-in-Thread
 Next-in-Forum Next-in-Forum

News Re: biasing muon cross section interaction 

Forum: Biasing and Scoring
Re: Question biasing muon cross section interaction (Sean Turnbull)
Re: Question Re: biasing muon cross section interaction (Stefan E. Mueller)
Re: Idea Re: biasing muon cross section interaction (C Mos)
Re: Question Re: biasing muon cross section interaction (Stefan E. Mueller)
Date: 05 May, 2014
From: Stefan E. Mueller <Stefan E. Mueller>

OK,

I think I managed to set the PIL-factor. I do it at the end of the Extra-Physics class I created to register the processes "GammaToMuPair" to gamma-process list, and "muonNuclear" to the mu+/mu- process lists, e.g.

   G4double fac = 20000.;
   G4ProcessTable* theProcessTable = G4ProcessTable::GetProcessTable();
   G4MuonNuclearProcess* muPlusNucScaleProcess = (G4MuonNuclearProcess*)
            theProcessTable->FindProcess("muonNuclear","mu+");
   if(muPlusNucScaleProcess) muPlusNucScaleProcess->SetPILfactor(1./fac);

However, I noted that e.g. for the process "GammaToMuPair", I can also call "SetCrossSecFactor(factor)".

What is the difference between "SetPILfactor(factor)" and "SetCrossSecFactor(factor)"? Which of the two will set the weight of the produced tracks accordingly? Both? None?

Stefan

Inline Depth:
 1 1
 All All
Outline Depth:
 1 1
 2 2
 All All
Add message: (add)

1 Idea: Re: biasing muon cross section interaction   (Stefan E. Mueller - 05 Jun, 2014)
 Add Message Add Message
to: "Re: biasing muon cross section interaction"

 Subscribe Subscribe

This site runs SLAC HyperNews version 1.11-slac-98, derived from the original HyperNews