|Message: Why cannot proton cross sections with the G4EmLivermorePhysics be biased???||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
I want to bias the proton elastic and inelastic cross sections using the scheme in the example GB01 in Geant4.10.1,and it can be achieved by adding process restrictions in the function GB01BOptrMultiParticleChangeCrossSection::ProposeOccurenceBiasingOperation() when the physicslist is QGSP_BIC_HP.But if I replace the G4EmStandardPhysics included in QGSP_BIC_HP with the more precise G4EmLivermorePhysics, the above function Propose...Operation will not be called in my simulation, so the biasing function can not be realized. And I find that as long as LivermorePhysics or other Em physics except the G4EmStandardPhysics appear in the physicslist, it will not be called. I register the LivermorePhysics through three methods:
G4VModularPhysicsList* physicsList = factory.GetReferencePhysList("FTFP_BERT_HP_LIV");
(2)QGSP_BIC_HP* physicsList = new QGSP_BIC_HP;
(3)using G4VModularPhysicsList to create a physicslist including LivermorePhysics
All of them fail to realize the biasing proton cross section function. However, it is ok when biasing the neutron cross sections with the above biasing scheme and physicslist change. So what is the problem? Why neutron is ok, but proton isn't? Why G4EmStandardPhysics is ok, but G4EmLivermorePhysics is not?
Any assistance would be greatful! Many thanks in advance!