|Message: Re: Simulation hang up||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:26:49 GMT, bilal wrote:
> > I encountered this issue before and saw the answer in a previous thread > so i keep my total number of particles upto a maximum of 1x10^9. However > i would love to see if someone change the data member from int to > something else and post how to do it. >This is not trivial, and it is not recommended because it could cause problems of "overflows" in the physics results. For example, consider accumulation of a dose, if you have really a large number of primaries you could lose precision of the results. The recommended way is to not go over a billion of events in a single job.
> Okay i check with the top command and all the cpus are busy 100 %. But i > print the events on screen (from event action) and it shows only a > couple of threads updating the number of events processed rest are > silent.
Are you sure the problem is not simply in logging?
> I tried to run the example with the memory leak command however > i cant understand the output (its a big file and i dont know how to find > where is the memory leak and how to fix it). Thank you for the help i > would appreciate any further comments or suggestions. >you do not need valgrind for this test, again using "top" monitor the memory usage and verify it does not grow without control.
|Inline Depth:||Outline Depth:||Add message:|