Message: Discussion of authorship by the D0 Collaboration Not Logged In (login)
 Next-in-Thread Next-in-Thread
 Next-in-Forum Next-in-Forum

None Discussion of authorship by the D0 Collaboration 

Forum: C11 Authorship
Re: None Working Group on Authorship: Interim Report (Vera Luth)
Date: 30 Jun, 2005
From: Dmitri Denisov <Dmitri Denisov>

Dear WG members!

The D0 Collaboration had its annual meeting a week ago with 
Institutional Board meeting to discuss different Collaboration wide 
issues. One of them was my report about C11 authorship WG progress and 
discussion of the D0 authorship rules. Below is outcome on major questions 
discussed. Vote was taken on each question with ~50 reps of 
the Collaboration institutes present (out of ~74 total). The vote was "not 
official" and outcome is not changing any of the current D0 authorship 
rules, rather we wanted to understand D0 Institutional Board  position on
authorship:

1. Alphabetical or non-alphabetical listing of authors: ~90oted for 
simple alphabetical listing with no exceptions.

2. Voluntary sign up as started by the Belle Collaboration: opinions here 
split, with ~70oting for this proposal.

3. Proposal to "partition collaboration into smaller units for 
publications": 100f IB reps voted it down.

So, position of the D0 Collaboration on the above issues is rather clear. 
We plan to have formal proposal for changes of the D0 authorship rules as 
soon as C11 authorship WG report is released.

As a reference: ~50f the D0 collaboration is from non-US groups (mainly 
Europe) and more then 50f the D0 members are involved in LHC 
collaborations, so above numbers might provide "exit poll" expectations.

Dmitri.

Inline Depth:
 1 1
 All All
Outline Depth:
 1 1
 2 2
 All All
Add message: (add)

1 None: Re: Discussion of authorship by the D0 Collaboration   (Lorenzo FOA - 02 Jul, 2005)
 Add Message Add Message
to: "Discussion of authorship by the D0 Collaboration"

 Subscribe Subscribe

This site runs SLAC HyperNews version 1.11-slac-91, derived from the original HyperNews


[ SLACsite Home | SLACsite discussions | Search | Feedback ]