Message: Revised Draft of Summary of Authorship Discussions Not Logged In (login)
 Next-in-Thread Next-in-Thread
 Next-in-Forum Next-in-Forum

None Revised Draft of Summary of Authorship Discussions 

Forum: C11 Authorship
Date: 19 Jun, 2005
From: Vera Luth <Vera Luth>

Dear Colleagues, 

I am sorry about the delay, but life has been hectic since my return 
from Europe.

We had a discussion via phone with some of you on June 3, mainly focusing
on various comments we had received, and on how to proceed.
It has been clear from the beginning, and even more so from the various
comments by members of this group that there is no consensus on
  - how suitable the current practice will be in the future as
    the collaborations grow, though there appears to be a majority 
    who believes that it will be ok,
  - whether the voluntary sign-up by Belle should be more widely 
    used, and whether it could be beneficial also to the large LHC 
    collaborations
  - whether a partition into subgroups or consortia should be 
    considered, in fact most members of the group outright reject it,
    but there are some who believe that if we really want to make
    authorship less an entitlement, something like this might have to 
    be instituted.

Anyway, it is not the purpose of this report to make decisions, but 
rather to assess options.

The questionnaire was discussed, and a shorter version is now appended 
to the report.  
The plan is to present the DRAFT report to C11 at its meeting on 
July 1st in Uppsala with the recommendation to distribute the 
questionnaire to the major collaboration for evaluation by its members.
We will need some technical help to make that possible.
I intend to briefly present it  in my report to the conference on C11 activities, 
provided you and C11 agree to that.

I have tried to improve the report and respond to the suggestions 
and criticism from you as best as I saw fit.
Thus I would like to ask you to read the report and send me comments
and critique by Friday, June 24th!  You can find the report  at
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~luth/WG_authors_05.pdf  

I'll be working of typo etc tomorrow.

Looking forward to your response,
Vera

 Add Message Add Message
to: "Revised Draft of Summary of Authorship Discussions"

 Subscribe Subscribe

This site runs SLAC HyperNews version 1.11-slac-91, derived from the original HyperNews


[ SLACsite Home | SLACsite discussions | Search | Feedback ]