Message: Re: Draft of Write-up on WG on Authorship Not Logged In (login)
 Next-in-Thread Next-in-Thread
 Next-in-Forum Next-in-Forum

None Re: Draft of Write-up on WG on Authorship 

Forum: C11 Authorship
Re: None Draft of Write-up on WG on Authorship (Vera Luth)
Re: None Re: Draft of Write-up on WG on Authorship (Max Klein)
Date: 04 Apr, 2005
From: Vera Luth <Vera Luth>

 Thank you Max for your long and detailed response.

 And, yes you are most welcome as a member of this working
 group, just because you are part of a large existing
 collaboration who has decided in the past not to change
 their policies. I fully respect you point of view which
 I know is shared by many! I will try and integrate your
 assessment of the current practice more closely in the
 report.
 But I still would like to present the two alternatives
 as option to be considered.

 We had decided at the last phone meeting that I write up
 the discussions we had had so far, which I tried to do and
 I had hoped for comments and critique like yours when I'
 posted it. We also agreed to develop a questionnaire,
 and since I did not get much input, I also drafted one
 myself for everybody else to critique.

 I had asked for a suitable date for another phone
 discussion, but had responses from only three of you,
 so I have not set up another session. Also, I had asked
 for all of you to send me a time and phone number for a
 one-on-one conversation by phone. No response so far!

 I am not adverse to a meeting in person. I talked to Dmitri
 and Hiro when they were at Stanford a couple of weeks ago.
 I am planning to be at CERN in early June, so we could
 arrange a meeting there on June 1st or June 3rd in the
 afternoon, at least for some of you.

 May be I can meet Lorenzo in Pisa on May 21 (Saturday)??
 or May 27th - 31 in Florence???

 Also, who of you are planning to attend the LP05 in Uppsala,
 we could certainly arrange to meet there again, before we
 present the report to C11. I am presently thinking of
 reporting on these discussions at the conference, and then
 send the questionnaire out afterwards if the working group
 and C11 still think that this is appropriate.

 So, I am looking forward for other comments on this draft
 write-up from the rest of you, and let me know how you
 would like to proceed.

Best regards
Vera

 Add Message Add Message
to: "Re: Draft of Write-up on WG on Authorship"

 Subscribe Subscribe

This site runs SLAC HyperNews version 1.11-slac-91, derived from the original HyperNews


[ SLACsite Home | SLACsite discussions | Search | Feedback ]