Re: Next Mtg: C11-Authorship Discussions: Feb. 16th

Help: Forums, postings and threads

Forums, postings and threads

Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.

Layout of the posting thread(s)

The posting threads can be shown with/without the text of the postings ("Inline depth"). In addition the depth of the thread can be controlled ("Outline depth"). For both cases several values are provided, which can be toggled. Note that the displayed values are those, which can be chosen, they do not correspond to the actual display status of the thread(s).

Add message

Add a new posting thread to this Forum

Show subscribers

Click "Show subscribers" to get the List of all subscribers, who receive e-mail from postings to this Forum, if they have not explictly unsubscribed from a posting thread. This includes:

Subscribers to the forum
Explicit subscribers to the posting or any of its ancestors
The author of the posting (if he has not unsubscribed)
The authors of any ancestor posting (if they have not unsubscribed)

Some browsers display old pages from the cache

Some browsers (e.g. Firefox) display a page from the cache even though the page has been updated. As a result, one may not get the latest messages in the forum's outline or the logon ID of the previous session appears on the upper right corner. If one suspects that he or she does not get the latest content of a page, try clearing up the personal data from the browser's cache as the following:

Tools -> Clear Private Data -> Clear Private Data (from browser Firefox)

Tools -> Delete Private Data (from browser Opera)

then reflesh the current page to get the latest content.

Details on "Inline depth" and "Outline depth"

Threads and the follow-up messages are numbered. There is one line per posting, normally starting with the posting number. The URLs of a posting and its responses reflect the depth of the follow-up postings. Watch the URLs to see how this is done. Depending on the chosen display options, the thread-display may be incomplete; the number of messages at the next level is, however, displayed, e.g. "…3 message(s)". You may not see all contributors unless you choose "All".

Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.

Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.

Argument Default value Alternative Comment

1 0 1 no text / full text of posting

2 1 All text for level 1 only / text for All postings

Argument	Default value	Alternative		Comment
1	0	1		no text / full text of posting
2	1	All		text for level 1 only / text for All postings

Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.

Argument Default value Alternative Comment

1 2 1 2 levels / 1 level (original posting)

2 3 2 3 levels / 2 levels

3 3 All 3 levels / all levels (all postings)

Argument	Default value	Alternative	Comment
1	2	1	2 levels / 1 level (original posting)
2	3	2	3 levels / 2 levels
3	3	All	3 levels / all levels (all postings)

Dear Vera!

The proposal to perform survey of the existing Collaborations about 
Authorship is an interesting idea. My attempt to get feedback from the D0
Colleagues (except private discussions and presentations at Institutional
Board meetings) was not very successful - at most a few people commented. 
List of questions should be developed by our working group: it will help 
in comparing results from different experiments using same metric. My 
preference that questions are distributed to all collaboration members 
(not subgroup inside an experiment), by collaboration reps on our
working group. We need to provide at least a month for everybody to comment.
It will be useful to have results of this survey before we have to draft
recommendations.

Dmitri.

On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Luth, Vera G. wrote:

>
> *** Discussion title:
> Wednesday, Feb. 16th, 6:00am Pacific Standard Time:
>
> This time translates to
>      9:00  US Eastern Time
>     15:00  Central European Time
>     23:00  Japan time
>
> A conference call is set up:
>
> Meeting Name: C11-Authors
> Call:         US  973 321 2000
> Pass Code:    286434 (followed by a # sign)
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> Now that the hypernews systems has supposedly been fixed, you should get this message twice - I am amazed how many obstacles we have encountered
> in communicating with each other.
>
> For this upcoming meeting I suggest the following agenda along the
> home work that was discussed in January.  Please let me know what
> you will be able to contribute to this meeting.
> Preferentially, we would like to post your presentation prior to
> the meeting.
>
> A.  Add to the surveys of past and current HEP collaborations:
>    1) total number of collaborators and institutions
>    2) estimate of number of conference talks and write-ups
>    3) number of seminars/colloquia
>    4) specify number of years over which publications extend
>
>      Complete records for BABAR (Jacques), Belle(Hiro),
>      CDF numbers(Daniel), H1(Max)
>
> B.  Practices in other fields
>     Try to get similar information for other fields
>     (in addition to LIGO and SLOAN)
>        Genetics (Vera, Pippa)
>        Astronomy (Dmitri)
>
> C. Other ideas for changes
>
> D. Impact of reduced authorlists
>
>   Can I call on Lorenzo Foa, Taku Yamanaka, Steinar Stapnes to develop some
>   discussion points?
>
>   Future discussions:
>   More thought needs to be given to the process of bringing
>   an LHC physics analysis to publication.  Like Higgs searches!
>
>   Also, Daniel is thinking on how to possibly develop a questionnaire
>   to get our colleagues' reactions to various proposals.  Should this
>   be initiated by the collaborations? Or can this group initiate this?
>
> ==============================================
> Vera G. Luth
> SLAC MS 95
> P.O. Box 20450
> Stanford, CA 94309
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Visit this SLACSite at hypernews.slac.stanford.edu message (to reply or unsubscribe) at:
> http://hypernews.slac.stanford.edu/HyperNews/slacsite/get/C11Authorship/22.html
>