Message: Re: Next Mtg: C11-Authorship Discussions: Feb. 16th Not Logged In (login)
 Next-in-Thread Next-in-Thread
 Next-in-Forum Next-in-Forum

None Re: Next Mtg: C11-Authorship Discussions: Feb. 16th 

Forum: C11 Authorship
Re: None Next Mtg: C11-Authorship Discussions: Feb. 16th (Vera Luth)
Date: 14 Feb, 2005
From: Lorenzo FOA <foa@cern.ch>

l

Dear Vera,
concerning your question on the questionaire, my opinion is that the
initiative should start from us and maybe be channeled through the
collaborations if we want to reach in particular the young people.
Maybe we should target separately young and senior physicists: their
optics is totally different.
ciao
Lorenzo
PS I send this mail only to you because the programs speaks of thousands
of people!

On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Luth, Vera G. wrote:

>
> *** Discussion title:
> Wednesday, Feb. 16th, 6:00am Pacific Standard Time:
>
> This time translates to
>       9:00  US Eastern Time
>      15:00  Central European Time
>      23:00  Japan time
>
> A conference call is set up:
>
> Meeting Name: C11-Authors
> Call:         US  973 321 2000
> Pass Code:    286434 (followed by a # sign)
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> Now that the hypernews systems has supposedly been fixed, you should get this message twice - I am amazed how many obstacles we have encountered
> in communicating with each other.
>
> For this upcoming meeting I suggest the following agenda along the
> home work that was discussed in January.  Please let me know what
> you will be able to contribute to this meeting.
> Preferentially, we would like to post your presentation prior to
> the meeting.
>
> A.  Add to the surveys of past and current HEP collaborations:
>     1) total number of collaborators and institutions
>     2) estimate of number of conference talks and write-ups
>     3) number of seminars/colloquia
>     4) specify number of years over which publications extend
>
>       Complete records for BABAR (Jacques), Belle(Hiro),
>       CDF numbers(Daniel), H1(Max)
>
> B.  Practices in other fields
>      Try to get similar information for other fields
>      (in addition to LIGO and SLOAN)
>         Genetics (Vera, Pippa)
>         Astronomy (Dmitri)
>
> C. Other ideas for changes
>
> D. Impact of reduced authorlists
>
>    Can I call on Lorenzo Foa, Taku Yamanaka, Steinar Stapnes to develop some
>    discussion points?
>
>    Future discussions:
>    More thought needs to be given to the process of bringing
>    an LHC physics analysis to publication.  Like Higgs searches!
>
>    Also, Daniel is thinking on how to possibly develop a questionnaire
>    to get our colleagues' reactions to various proposals.  Should this
>    be initiated by the collaborations? Or can this group initiate this?
>
> ==============================================
> Vera G. Luth
> SLAC MS 95
> P.O. Box 20450
> Stanford, CA 94309
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Visit this SLACSite at hypernews.slac.stanford.edu message (to reply or unsubscribe) at:
> http://hypernews.slac.stanford.edu/HyperNews/slacsite/get/C11Authorship/22.html
>

Inline Depth:
 1 1
 All All
Outline Depth:
 1 1
 2 2
 All All
Add message: (add)

1 None: Re: Next Mtg: C11-Authorship Discussions: Feb. 16th   (Daniel Whiteson - 14 Feb, 2005)
 Add Message Add Message
to: "Re: Next Mtg: C11-Authorship Discussions: Feb. 16th"

 Subscribe Subscribe

This site runs SLAC HyperNews version 1.11-slac-91, derived from the original HyperNews


[ SLACsite Home | SLACsite discussions | Search | Feedback ]