| Message: Re: How is parallelization implemented using MPI and Geant4? | Not Logged In (login) |
> > In my program, G4beamline, I seed the random number generator with the event > > number > This random generator seeding does sound reasonable. If you don't do > that, you'll always get the same result running your application. It's > all pseudo random after all. I however would use the thread number (if > possible) to name the files. Yes, one definitely need different seeds. Thread number is not guaranteed to be unique on multiple systems (e.g. a Linux cluster); first event number is (because we arranged it).
> However doing an: > mpdboot -n 20 > mpiexec -n 20 mympiapp > Is easier than writing a shell script.
Only after installing MPI on every machine. I use a shell script on my 4-CPU Mac Pro all the time:
g4beamline input.file first=0 last=999999 >0.out 2>&1 &
g4beamline input.file first=1000000 last=1999999 >1000000.out 2>&1 &
g4beamline input.file first=2000000 last=2999999 >2000000.out 2>&1 &
g4beamline input.file first=3000000 last=3999999 >3000000.out 2>&1 &
The input.file defines the simulation; it uses $first to name the output Root file and processes events from $first to $last ($ means parameter expansion).
> > This works for parallelization up to perhaps 32 jobs. Beyond that it gets > > rather cumbersome; certainly 10,000 parallel jobs is not feasible this way. > > Well 10.000 sounds hilarious. There are a number of applications that need it. I expect that in a few years both CMS and ATLAS will scale to that level of parallelization. Perhaps not for simulations, and perhaps not for a single "job", but the need is there, and tool providers must be ready.
|
|
to: |